Which approach is used to manage scope changes in a contract?

Which approach is used to manage scope changes in a contract?

• A. Expedite changes without approvals
• B. Implement changes via informal addenda
• C. Change control process with formal approvals
• D. Ignore changes if small

Answer: (C)

A formal change control process with approvals is used to manage scope changes in a contract. Any proposed change is captured as a change request, analyzed for its impact on schedule, cost, and performance, and reviewed by the designated authorities before approval. Once approved, a written change order or contract amendment updates the scope, price, and timeline, and the project baseline is adjusted accordingly. This approach ensures traceability, accountability, and alignment with the contract, while preventing uncontrolled scope creep. Rushing changes without approvals can lead to disputes and ambiguity, informal addenda can be inconsistent or unenforceable, and ignoring changes undermines the contract’s risk management.

A formal change control process with approvals is used to manage scope changes in a contract. Any proposed change is captured as a change request, analyzed for its impact on schedule, cost, and performance, and reviewed by the designated authorities before approval. Once approved, a written change order or contract amendment updates the scope, price, and timeline, and the project baseline is adjusted accordingly. This approach ensures traceability, accountability, and alignment with the contract, while preventing uncontrolled scope creep. Rushing changes without approvals can lead to disputes and ambiguity, informal addenda can be inconsistent or unenforceable, and ignoring changes undermines the contract’s risk management.